<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://genster.zolve.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>genster - All Comments</title><link>http://genster.zolve.com/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Debug Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Looking For Luxury Real Estate: The Real Bargains Are In Puerto Vallarta</title><link>http://genster.zolve.com/readblogs/2008/07/24/looking-for-luxury-real-estate-the-real-bargains-are-in-puerto-vallarta.aspx#32270</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:03:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6fdb550a-b3c7-4477-ba32-2bfe2cd104ab:32270</guid><dc:creator>genster</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;so what is the price range(s) for these properties?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Jason&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://genster.zolve.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32270" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Yeah, the economy in the US sucks</title><link>http://genster.zolve.com/readblogs/2008/07/24/yeah-the-economy-in-the-us-sucks.aspx#32269</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:01:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6fdb550a-b3c7-4477-ba32-2bfe2cd104ab:32269</guid><dc:creator>genster</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for this. I have been looking into mexico for quite some time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michelle&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://genster.zolve.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32269" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Yeah, the economy in the US sucks</title><link>http://genster.zolve.com/readblogs/2008/07/24/yeah-the-economy-in-the-us-sucks.aspx#32200</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:45:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6fdb550a-b3c7-4477-ba32-2bfe2cd104ab:32200</guid><dc:creator>realestatefla1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Amero Currency: One Union Under God? With Liberty?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This site is intended to make United States citizens aware of the advancement of the agenda to launch &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the nations of North America, including the U.S., into a continental union similar to the European Union.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The international work-in-progress, named the &amp;quot;Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(SPP),&amp;quot; has a broad scope. The program goal, according to a release by the White House Office of the &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Press Secretary, is&amp;quot;To enhance the competitive position of North American industries in the global &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;marketplace and to provide greater economic opportunity for all of our societies, while maintaining high &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;standards of health and safety for our people, the United States, Mexico, and Canada will work together, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and in consultation with stakeholders, to:&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Improve Productivity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reduce the Costs of Trade&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enhance the Quality of Life&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Initially, these goals sound reasonable. However, upon inspection and understanding of the background &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;of the movement, it becomes clear that, once fully implemented, the newly formed organization will usurp &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;authority of the U.S., and redistribute power and wealth among the three North American nations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The brain trusts behind the philosophies that laid the groundwork for the program, in its current and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;future forms, elaborate a broader view of economics and &amp;quot;sovereignty&amp;quot; that also redistribute economic &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and legislative powers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the web site of the U.S. Senate, Robert Pastor--a former U.S. National Security Council &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;director--discussing the SPP, testified:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NAFTA has failed to create a partnership because North American governments have not changed &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the way they deal with one another. Dual bilateralism, driven by U.S. power, continue to govern and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;irritate. Adding a third party to bilateral disputes vastly increases the chance that rules, not power, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;will resolve problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This trilateral approach should be institutionalized in a new North American Advisory Council. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike the sprawling and intrusive European Commission, the Commission or Council should be &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;lean, independent, and advisory, composed of 15 distinguished individuals, 5 from each nation. Its &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;principal purpose should be to prepare a North American agenda for leaders to consider at &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;biannual summits and to monitor the implementation of the resulting agreements. It should be an &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;advisor to the three leaders but also a public voice and symbol of North America. It should evaluate &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ways to facilitate economic integration, producing specific proposals on continental issues such as &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;harmonizing environmental and labor standards and forging a competition policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian interparliamentary &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;groups into a single “North American Parliamentary Group.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pastor goes further, suggesting (As the SPP defines) less emphasis on national border security:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;At the same time, our Task Force recommends that all three governments define and defend a &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;continental perimeter.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also goes so far as to define:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The North American Council should develop an integrated continental plan for transportation and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;infrastructure that includes new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors. The &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;United States and Canada should each develop national standards on weight, safety, and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;configuration of trucking and then negotiate with Mexico to establish a single set of standards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://genster.zolve.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32200" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>